IMPLEMENTATION OF BIM TECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC SECTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24867/12CG16BrcanskiKeywords:
Computable Building Code, Automated Model Checking, BIM implementation, Automated Code Checking, Public Procurement, e-ProcurementAbstract
Building codes and regulatoy standards are becoming increasingly complex with the aquisition of new knowleadge in the design and construction domain. The necessity for computable represetation of the building code checking process is becoming even more critical. With the development of Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology, the automated compliance checking systems for building codes becomes achievable. It is regarded as one of the technologies with the most potential to provide significant value to the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. This study also shows that nowadays BIM, and especially Model Checking, can be a useful support for Public Procurement, but only if the Public Clients hold the control of the process and they are able to define clear requirements.
References
[2] Bolpagni M.,(2013). The implementation of BIM within the public procurement-A model-based approach for the construction industry
[3] Dimyadi, J. & Amor, R., Automated Building Code Compliance Checking – Where is it at? Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress, eds. S. Kajewski, K. Manley and K. Hampson, Queensland University of Technology, ISBN: 978-0-9875542-1-5, Paper 241, 2013.
[4] Eastman, C., Lee, J., Jeong, Y., and Lee, J. (2009). Automatic rule-based checking of building designs. Automation in Construction, 18(8), pp. 1011–1033. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.07.002
[5] Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., and Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN9780470261309.doi:10.1002/9780470261309
[6] Han, C.S., Kunz, J., and Law, K.H. (1997) “Making automated building code checking a reality.” Management Journal, IFMA September/October: 1-7
[7] Hjelseth, E., and Nisbet, N., (2010b) “Overview of Concepts for Model Checking”. Presented at CIB W78 2010 27th International Conference - Applications of IT in the AEC Industry
[8] Hjelseth, E., (2015) “Public BIM-based model checking solutions: lessons learned from Singapore and Norway”, DOI: 10.2495/BIM150351
[9] Hjelseth, E., and Nisbet, N. (2011). Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up (RASE) methodology. In Proceedings of CIB W78-W102 Conference, pp. 1–10. Sophia Antipolis, France.
[10] Hjelseth,E. (2014) ByggNett (BuildNetwork)—Norwegian Project for Web-Based Collaboration between Public Authorities and the Construction Industry, DOI: 10.1061/9780784413616.111
[11] Khemlani, L. (2005). CORENET e-PlanCheck: Singapore’s automated code checking system. AECbytes “Building the Future”. Retrieved November 15, 2012, from http://aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2005/CORENETePlanCheck.html
[12] Nawari, N.O. and Alsaffar, A. (2016). “Understanding Computable Building Codes”. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(6): 163-172, March, 2016
[13] Sing T.F., Zhong, Q. (2001). COnstruction and Real Estate NETwork (CORENET)
[14] Tien Foo Sing and Qi Zhong, DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000005831
[15] USAID (2017), Monitoring efekata sistema za izdavanje dozvola za gradnju u 2017. godini iz ugla nadležnih organa i investitora
[16] Zhang, J., and El-Gohary, N. (2011). “Automated information extraction from construction-related regunatory documents for automated compliance checking”. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of CIB w87, Sophia Antipolis, France, 2011
