AHP - VIKOR METHODOLOGY AS A BASIS FOR ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE OF INSURANCE COMPANIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Authors

  • Igor Jocev Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24867/27JV01Jocev

Keywords:

AHP and VIKOR methods

Abstract

We get to know the concept of insurance and insurance companies. The basic concepts of reinsurance are introduced, as well as many divisions of insurance. AHP and VIKOR methods are presented both from the theoretical point of view and from the side of practical application. At the end, the conclusions were presented.

References

[1] Njegomir, Vladimir. Minimiziranje rizika osiguravajućih društava. s.l. : Industrija, 2007.
[2] Njegomir , Vladimir. Upravljanje imovinom i obavezama osiguravajućih društava. Beograd : Računovodstvo, Savez računovođa i revizora Srbje, 2006.
[3] Njegomir, Vladimir. Operativni rizik osiguravajućih društava. s.l. : Računovodstvo, Savez računovođa i revizora Srbje, 2007.
[4] Zakon o osiguranju. Beograd : Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, broj 139/14, 2014.
[5] Odluka o ograničenjima pojedinih oblika deponovanja i ulaganja tehničkih rezervi i o najvišim iznosima pojedinih deponovanja i ulaganja garantne rezerve društva za osiguranje. Beograd : Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, 2012.
[6] Mandić, Ksenija. Analysis of the efficiency of insurance companies in Serbia using the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. s.l. : Economic research, 2017.
[7] Minić, Blažen. Poređenje AHP i TOPSIS metode kod višekriterijumskog grupnog odlučivanja primenom rasplinute logike. s.l. : Ekonomske ideje i praksa, 2012.
[8] Nikolić, M. Primena metode VIKOR za izbor strategije održavanja. Tehnička dijagnostika. 2010.
[9] Čolović, Vladimir. Pravo-teorije i prakse.
[10] Carmel pokazatelji poslovanja društava za osiguranje sa okvirnim uputstvima za njihovo tumačenje. Beograd : Narodna banka Srbije.
[11] Finansijski izveštaji. [Online] https://www.nbs.rs/internet/latinica/60/60_2/index.html.
[12] Solvency II Set to Reshape Asset Allocation and Capital Markets. Insurance Rating Group Special Report. New York : FitchRatings, June 2011.
[13] European Insurance in Figures. Insurance Europe. s.l. : Brussels, December, 2014.
[14] The Benefits of Insurance. Insurance Europe. s.l. : Brussels, 2015.
[15] Blommestein, Hj and Funke , N. Institutional Investors in the New Financial Landscape. Paris : OECD, 1998.
[16] Kočović, J and Šulejić, P. Osiguranje. Beograd : Ekonomski fakultet, 2002.
[17] Policy Issues in Insurance . Catastrophic Risks And Insurance. Paris : OECD, 2005.
[18] Odluka o bližim kriterijumima i načinu obračunavanja rezervi za izravnanje rizika. s.l. : Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, 13/05 23/06.
[19] Jadhay, A and Sonar, R. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), weighted scoring method (WSM), and hybrid knowledge based system (HKBS) for software selection: a comparative study. s.l. : Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology, 2009.
[20] Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Opricovic, S and Tzeng, G H. 2004, European journal of operational research.
[21] Marović, B and Avdalović, V. Osiguranje i upravljanje rizikom. Suubotica : Biografika a.d., 2004.
[22] Marcinko, D E. Insurance & Risk Management Strategies For Physicians and Advisors. s.l. : A Strategic Approach, Jones and Bartlett Publish.
[23] Booth, P, et al., et al. Modern Actuarial Th eory and Practice, Chapman & Hall/CRC. FL, US : Boca Raton, 1999.
[24] Lukić, R. Računovodstvo osiguravajućih kompanija. Beograd : Ekonomski fakultet Beograd, 2003.
[25] Principles on Capital Adequacy and Solvency. International Association of Insurance Supervisors. Basel : s.n., January, 2002.
[26] Tilman , L. Asset/Liability Management of Financial Institutions. London : Euromoney Institutional Investor, 2003.
[27] Institutional Investors. Davis, E P and Steil, B. 2001, The MIT Press Cambridge.

Published

2024-08-04