CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ADOPTING LEAN SIX SIGMA METHODOLOGY IN REMOTE WORK ENVIRONMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24867/32GI08DamjanovicKeywords:
Lean Six Sigma, continuous improvement, TQM, HRMAbstract
This paper analyzes the application of the Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology in highly digitalized work environments, with a particular focus on remote work. It explores how Total Quality Management (TQM) and Human Resource Management (HRM) influence employee motivation for adopting LSS initiatives. The study employs a quantitative analysis method to identify key success factors for LSS in digitalized settings, emphasizing practical recommendations for adapting LSS strategies to a digital workforce. The results highlight the significant role of management and the challenges in implementing HRM practices in the context of remote work.
References
[1] George, M. (2003). ‘’Lean Six Sigma for Service: How to Use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality to Improve Services and Transactions’’. McGraw-Hill.
[2] Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). ‘’Defining and developing measures of lean production’’. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785–805.
[3] Dahlgaard, J. J., Kristensen, K., & Kanji, G. K. (1998). ‘’Fundamentals of Total Quality Management’’. Chapman & Hall.
[4] Pettersen, J. (2009). ‘’Defining lean production: Some conceptual and practical issues’’. The TQM Journal
[5] Lameijer, B., Pereira, V., & Antony, J. (2016). ‘’Critical success factors for Lean Six Sigma implementation in financial services’’. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(4), 394–411.
[6] Richter, A., Reisinger, C., & Jäger, T. (2018). ‘’Reimagining work: The importance of digital tools in remote work settings’’. Human Resource Management Review, 28(3), 365–378.
[7] Enos, J. (2021). ‘’Digital Transformation and Lean Six Sigma: Challenges in remote environments’’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(5)
[8] Khanam, S., Siddiqui, J., & Talib, F. (2015). ‘’Role of TQM in promoting Lean Six Sigma adoption in service organizations’’. Journal of Business Excellence, 5(1), 15–28.
[9] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). ‘’The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies’’. W. W. Norton & Company.
[10] Lameijer, B., Pereira, V., & Antony, J. (2021). ‘’Enhancing LSS implementation in digitalized environments: The moderating role of remote work’’. Journal of Business Research, 124(1), 98–107.
[11] Antony, J. (2022). ‘’Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma: Synergistic opportunities’’. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 13(2), 234–245.
[12] Lameijer, B., Pereira, V., & Antony, J. (2021). ‘’Redefining Lean Six Sigma for the digital age’’. Journal of Operations Management, 48(3), 22–38.
[13] Skalli, A., & Tissir, B. (2023). ‘’Lean Six Sigma in the era of Industry 4.0: Challenges and prospects’’. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 56(7), 19–33.
[14] Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., & Choo, A. S. (2003). ‘’Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams’’. Journal of Operations Management,
[15] De Mast, J., Lokkerbol, J., & Does, R. J. (2022). ‘’Lean Six Sigma in service organizations: Applications and innovations’’. Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, 18(3), 77–95.
[16] Choo, A. S., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. G. (2007). ‘’Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects’’. Management Science, 53(3), 437–450.
[17] Vidal, M. (2007). ‘’Lean production, worker empowerment, and job satisfaction’’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 503–523.
