Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Industrial Engineering and Management

Vol. 41 No. 03 (2026): Proceedings of the Faculty of Technical Sciences

Research on employee job satisfaction through organizational commitment and perception of justice in the Republic of Serbia

  • Tijana Vukotić
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24867/34GI26Vukotic
Submitted
March 16, 2026
Published
2026-03-16

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between working conditions, perceptions of organizational justice and employee commitment with their overall job satisfaction. The research was conducted on a sample of 60 respondents in organizations in the Republic of Serbia, using standardized measurement instruments and statistical data processing SPSS 26. The results show that favorable working conditions and fair treatment significantly contribute to employee commitment, which is further associated with a higher level of job satisfaction..

References

  1. [1] Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review
  2. [2] Locke, E. A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago: Rand McNally
  3. [3] Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior. Pearson
  4. [4] Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press
  5. [5] Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299
  6. [6] Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9-22
  7. [7] Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. L. (2001). Procedural and Distributive Justice are More Similar than You Think: A Monistic Perspective and a Research Agenda. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 119-151).
  8. [8] Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. Process and Outcome: Gender Differences in the Assessment of Justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 83-98