Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Mechanical Engineering

Vol. 41 No. 10 (2026): Proceedings of the Faculty of Technical Sciences

Tensile Properties and Biocompatibility of Stainless Steel AISI 302 in Different Physiological Saline Solutions

  • Николина Кљештан
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24867/36AM04Kljestan
Submitted
October 14, 2026
Published
2026-10-16

Abstract

Stainless steels are important biomaterials used in the production of orthopedic implants due to their favorable combination of mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. In a biological environment, they are exposed to physiological solutions, which may affect their long-term stability. This study analyzes the influence of physiological saline, phosphate-buffered, and Ringer’s solution on the mechanical and surface characteristics of AISI 302 steel after 3 and 21 days of exposure to these solutions. The obtained results show that both the type of solution and exposure time influence the material behavior, however observed changes are not always statistically significant.

References

  1. [1] G. Manivasagam, D. Dhinasekaran, and A. Rajamanickam, “Biomedical Implants: Corrosion and its Prevention -A Review,” Recent Patents on Corrosion Science, pp. 40–54, Jun. 2010.
  2. [2] P. S. Mileend, “Corrosion of bio-materials,” International Journal of Metallurgical & Materials Science and Engineering (IJMMSE), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21-28, 2020.
  3. [3] J. B. Park, “Biomaterials science and engineering,” Plenum, pp. 193–233, 1984.
  4. [4] K. M. Ismail, A. Jayaraman, T. K. Wood, and J. C. Earthman, “The influence of bacteria on the passive film stability of 304 stainless steel,” Electrochim. Acta, vol. 44, pp. 4685–4692, 1999.
  5. [5] A. Sadaqat, A.-R. Ahmad-Majdi, A. Syed Waqar, and H. Ghulam, “Biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of metallic biomaterial,” Corrosion Reviews, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 381-402, 2020.
  6. [6] M. Ali, N. K. F. Al-Asadi, and J. H. Mohmmed, “Corrosion-induced mechanical properties deterioration in 304L and 316L stainless steels under simulated physiological conditions: A comparative study,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 91–99, 2025.
  7. [7] C. Barile, C. Casavola, and C. Pappalettere, “Corrosion effects on mechanical properties of sintered stainless steel,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 5, pp. 195-201, 2017.
  8. [8] R. Alessandro and D. S. Marco, “Experimental investigation on the bio-tribocorrosive behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy and 316 L stainless steel in two biological solutions,” Tribol. Int., vol. 10, 109033, pp. 1-13, 2023.