Proceeding of the Faculty of technical Sciences, Novi Sad

Environment and Occupational Safety Engineering

Vol. 34 No. 05 (2019): Proceedings of the Faculty of Technical Sciences

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF CONVENTIONAL AND UNDERGROUND CONTAINERS IN THE EVENT TOWN OF KIKINDA

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24867/02HZ07Kuzmanovic
Submitted
October 22, 2018
Published
2019-05-02

Abstract

The need to reduce the time of collecting waste in a fast and efficient way possible using underground container. The main advantage of the installation of underground containers to hide what you do not need to see and feel.

References

[1] EEA - European Environment Agency, 2012. Material Resources And Waste, Kongens Nytorv 6, 1050 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Republički zavod za statistiku. 2018. Статистички годишњак Републике Србије, Милана Ракића 5, Београд
[3] Ronka K, Ritola J, Rauhala K 1998. Underground Space in Land-Use Planning, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
[4] План управљања отпадом општине Кикинда за период од 2010. до 2020. године. 2018. Извор: www.kikinda.rs
[5] Nexus Novus. 2015. Waste-free Himachal Pradesh A Feasibility Study, Kasturi Nagar, 560043 Bangalore, India
[6] ADEME. 2017. International Benchmark And Cost Analysis Of Automated Vaccuum Waste Collection Projects. 20, avenue du Grésillé BP 90406 | 49004 Angers Cedex 01
[7] Kogler T. 2007. Waste Collection, ISWA Working Group on Collection and Transportation Technology
[8] Аноним. 2018. Improving Quality: Small-town America's cost battle for automated refuse collection, Извор: http://www3.apwa.net
[9] Аноним. 2018. Solid waste collection and transport in large-capacity containers, eurocontainers and press containers, Извор: https://www.mariuspedersen.cz