Proceedings of the Faculty of Technical Sciences

Environment and Occupational Safety Engineering

Vol. 41 No. 07 (2026): Proceedings of the Faculty of Technical Sciences

Comparative Analysis of Ecological Sustainability of Dermocosmetic Brands Available on the Market of the Republic of Serbia

  • Milena Borenović
  • Maja Petrovic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24867/35HZ01Borenovic
Submitted
July 9, 2026
Published
2026-07-15

Abstract

The paper explores the ecological sustainability of dermocosmetic products, with a particular focus on assessing brand sustainability practices and consumer perceptions in this context. The analysis addresses contemporary trends and challenges of sustainability in the cosmetics industry, the influence of consumer habits, and the sustainability of the product life cycle, including formulation, production, packaging, and distribution. The research provides insight into existing environmental initiatives of dermocosmetic brands and consumer expectations, highlighting potential directions for enhancing sustainability and promoting circular resource management within the dermocosmetic sector.

References

  1. [1] World Economic Forum. (2019). A new circular vision for electronics: Time for a global reboot. WEF Report.
  2. [2] A. Belousov, A. Koryakin, and P. Smirnov, “Economic perspectives in sustainable ingredient substitution,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 26, pp. 580–590, 2021.
  3. [3] M. Garetti and M. Taisch, “Sustainable manufacturing: Trends and research challenges,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 23, no. 2–3, pp. 83–104, 2011. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2011.591619.
  4. [4] B. Keeble, The Brundtland Report: Our Common Future and Its Legacy, Oxford University Press, 1988.
  5. [5] V. Haller, A. Menrad, and M. Häring, “Sustainability in the cosmetics industry: A case study analysis,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 276, pp. 123-142, 2020.
  6. [6] M. Bom, R. Kleef, and A. Faergemann, “Circular economy approaches in cosmetic packaging design,” Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 21, pp. e00112, 2019.
  7. [7] S. Jahn and R. Brühl, “Sustainability labels in the cosmetics industry: Consumer trust and CSR perception,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 108, pp. 316–324, 2019.
  8. [8] R. Baratta, L. Rossi, and F. Vrontis, “ESG-driven innovation and brand trust in cosmetic markets,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1751–1765, 2023.
  9. [9] K. Bakerjian, “Greenwashing in the beauty industry: Challenges and consumer response,” Journal of Environmental Communication, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 987–1001, 2022.
  10. [10] ISO 14040:2006, Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Framework, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2006.
  11. [11] ISO 14044:2006, Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Requirements and Guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2006.
  12. [12] G. Gatti, L. Carfagna, and P. Ferrari, “Responsible sourcing and biodiversity protection in cosmetic ingredients,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 138, pp. 199–210, 2018.
  13. [13] Y. Oe and K. Yamaoka, “Consumer perception of sustainable cosmetics in developing markets,” Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 56–71, 2022.
  14. [14] A. Amberg and C. Fogarassy, “Clean beauty and consumer awareness in the EU cosmetics market,” European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 45–58, 2019.
  15. [15] A. Lewis, S. Vermeer, and K. Reed, “Sustainable packaging in the cosmetics industry,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 267–283, 2021.
  16. [16] C. Hwang and S. Choi, “Green chemistry innovations in cosmetic manufacturing,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 22567–22579, 2020.
  17. [17] C. Nair and R. Pillai, “Eco-design and sustainable consumer behavior in cosmetics,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1514–1530, 2021.
  18. [18] L. Lee and M. Chen, “Transparency and eco-label credibility in the cosmetics industry,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3411–3423, 2019.
  19. [19] A. Belousov, J. Dölle, and M. Leiser, “Green surfactants and their biodegradability in personal care products,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 626, pp. 127–138, 2021.
  20. [20] F. Chemat, M. Abert-Vian, and G. Cravotto, “Green extraction of natural products: Concept and principles,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 1–24, 2019.
  21. [21] United Nations, Sustainable Development Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, UN SDG Knowledge Platform, 2020.
  22. [22] S. Radin, “Waterless beauty: The next frontier in sustainable cosmetics,” Cosmetics & Toiletries Magazine, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 22–29, 2020.
  23. [23] ISO 22716:2007, Cosmetics — Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) — Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practices, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2007.
  24. [24] Cosmetics Europe, Sustainability and the Cosmetics Industry: 2022 Progress Report, Brussels, 2022.
  25. [25] L’Oréal Group, L’Oréal for the Future — Sustainability Commitments 2030, Corporate Report, Paris, 2022.
  26. [26] Procter & Gamble, Environmental Sustainability 2030 Roadmap, Cincinnati, 2020.
  27. [27] A. Cinelli, G. Di Giacomo, and P. Salvio, “Biodegradable and bio-based packaging in cosmetics,” Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 22, pp. e00145, 2019.
  28. [28] R. Sahota, Sustainability: How the Cosmetics Industry Is Greening Up, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2014. Милена Бореновић рођена је у Новом Садуи 1998. године. Дипломски рад из области заштите животне средине одбранила је на Факултету техничких наука 2022. године.